Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		
Hi,
 
Probably one for the dev's..?? 
A friends ask me to look at putting together a " Mini i7 PC" bare bones with LL on it. 
((It's new, only 4 review's, 3 are running Linux on it.))
 
It's got 2 X mSATA slots, and he asked if it's possible to do a "RAID 0" set-up on them, 
for improved throughput, but at the loss of redundancy. So put the OS across 2 X 120GB SSD's
	  
	
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
 Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
  
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,255 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Aug 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Would that not be op to the bios more than the operating system wirezfree?
	 
	
	
LL 3.6,2.8 
Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop 
Dell 755 > Desktop 
Acer 150 > Desktop 
I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
		
		
		10-08-2015, 11:11 PM 
(This post was last modified: 10-08-2015, 11:16 PM by Wirezfree.)
		
	 
	
		Yes, you can have H/W based raid controllers, but also Software based. 
In Windows it was possible in Software, it was added from XP Pro on, depending on version.
 
EDIT.. 
Just found this on " Ubuntu Software Raid" 
Quick read seems to indicate a "Alternate Install".. need to read more
	  
	
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
 Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
  
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,255 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Aug 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Well, if looking for a software raid solution, instead of a hardware raid solution. 
You get to pick the search term.
 http://www.googlubuntu.com/
Good Luck.
	  
	
	
LL 3.6,2.8 
Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop 
Dell 755 > Desktop 
Acer 150 > Desktop 
I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Thanks... 
Found a couple of things, but they are on  Mint RAID 0 &  MINT RAID 1 need to read a few times... seems a little techy
	  
	
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
 Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
  
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,849 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
		
		
		10-09-2015, 12:49 AM 
(This post was last modified: 10-09-2015, 01:01 AM by firenice03.)
		
	 
	
		If looking to RAID, I've always heard hardware RAIDs were preferred over software - now sure software has come along way and maybe the hardware doesn't support it in the set up....  
If an OS level RAID for a workstation, wouldn't there be concern if the OS went corrupt??? Just thinking out loud.. 
Defiantly intriguing though     
	 
	
	
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2 
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics 
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200) 
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved  
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server 
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2 
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		@ firenice03,
 
Yes, there are risks... Certain types of RAID allow you to have disk failures, 
then when you replace the disk, it re-builds the array itself based on content on remaining disks. 
Normally RAID is used in Servers. 
I think it was curiosity because it's unusual to have multiple mSata slots in such a small PC.
 
There are H/W devices that allow you to build a RAID device from 2 X mSata cards 
that then fit in a single 2.5" slot, but they have mixed reviews... 
Like this one  2 X mSata Adapter
	 
	
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
 Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
  
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,849 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Thanks Wirezfree 
 (10-09-2015, 07:51 AM)Wirezfree link Wrote:  @firenice03, 
 
Yes, there are risks... Certain types of RAID allow you to have disk failures, 
then when you replace the disk, it re-builds the array itself based on content on remaining disks. 
Normally RAID is used in Servers. 
I think it was curiosity because it's unusual to have multiple mSata slots in such a small PC. 
 
 
 
There are H/W devices that allow you to build a RAID device from 2 X mSata cards 
that then fit in a single 2.5" slot, but they have mixed reviews... 
Like this one 2 X mSata Adapter 
That adapter is cool... Back in the day I RAID'ed (lol)  a workstation, but just for storage the OS was on a separate disk for that reason... I'm curious how well it works..  
I've thought about a Windows server with drives in a RAID mostly for storage and redundancy (pictures), then debated a NAS (FreeNAS is pretty slick) but hey if LL can pull it off too    ...
	  
	
	
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2 
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics 
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200) 
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved  
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server 
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2 
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		I have been reading some of the stuff on setting up RAID... 
I got a headache, seems like luck if you get it working, very mixed results. 
I think I will suggest he thinks about normal install... 
To be honest I'm not sure how much improvement it will give over just using single SSD disk.?? 
 
Yes, that dual mSATA H/W raid looks interesting 
But @ $220 for 2 X mSATA(120GB) and the mSATA Card, 
It could prove to be an expensive experiment....
	 
	
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
 Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
  
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,849 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		I hear ya,  especially when you start looking at the differences, the gains and then the one offs...  
 (10-09-2015, 06:30 PM)Wirezfree link Wrote:  But @ $220 for 2 X mSATA(120GB) and the mSATA Card, 
It could prove to be an expensive experiment.... Isn't that just about everything     lol
	  
	
	
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2 
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics 
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200) 
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved  
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server 
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2 
 
	
	
 
 
	 
 |