Login

Coastie · 01-03-2015, 09:08 PM

(01-02-2015, 09:54 AM)Jerry link Wrote: ... I don't think Linux Lite 7.4 sounds particularly appealing. ...

I hate to disagree with you, Jerry, but I think Linux Lite 7.3 sounds very appealing. I voted for keeping the current naming/numbering system as it is but would have voted for just numbering as it is now without any names if I had the choice. That would keep it simple as in "Simple, fast, free." 8)

***valtam*** · 01-04-2015, 02:19 AM

(01-03-2015, 02:57 PM)gold_finger link Wrote: Jerry,

I just re-read the original post and realized that the schedule seems to reflect 3 new releases a year (every 4 months) instead of 2 (as was done before). Is that correct? Or did you mean to schedule at 6 months intervals for 2 releases per year?

What I've tried to do is space it out evenly between the last release (2.2) and the next LTS. Also taking into consideration other factors that affect release dates I haven't listed.

***valtam*** · 01-04-2015, 02:31 AM

I've removed the other 2 suggestions (Planets, Periodic Table) for a change of name for the Codebase. Since we started with Gems we will continue with them. The Thread asks for input on version, not Codenames. Cheers.

Hans · 01-04-2015, 06:51 AM

I agree with Coastie, above. So far the codename and number of release works well... if it ain't broken, don't fix it, right?

I think LinuxLite 7.2 or 7.4 sounds very appealling, as well.

So I have voted for this option.

Alex · 01-04-2015, 11:08 AM

Yes I voted for the familiar numbering system it's easy and most people with computers feel used to it with other systems, there is no need to introduce more complications. LinuLite 8.7 sounds good and will show endurance.

Smile

Wirezfree · 01-04-2015, 11:45 AM

Yes, I voted for numbers...
On reflection Planet/Moons might have worked from the get go... not now.

Anyway LL is going to be around a long...long time.... we might need big numbers Smile

((just like nVidia have 340.09 Wink

))

altman · 01-04-2015, 01:00 PM

Firefox comes to mind also . Lets wait & see what the Team will do on that one .

***valtam*** · 01-04-2015, 01:29 PM

Quote:I hate to disagree with you, Jerry...

I have no problem with people disagreeing with me, it's just one of the many ways we can improve things. As long as they use a polite and constructive tone I'm happy to engage them Smile

Coastie · 01-04-2015, 09:25 PM

(01-04-2015, 01:29 PM)Jerry link Wrote: I have no problem with people disagreeing with me, it's just one of the many ways we can improve things. As long as they use a polite and constructive tone I'm happy to engage them

Can't ask for more! 8)

bitsnpcs · 01-04-2015, 10:26 PM

I voted for the current number scheme (last option in poll).

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Poll: Linux Lite Future Naming / Numbering Scheme? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Letters - Linux Lite Citrine A, B, C, etc. (misko_2083)	0%	0	0%
Roman Numerals - Linux Lite Citrine I, II, III, IV, etc. (misko_2083)	56.25%	9	56.25%
Numbers (In Words) - Linux Lite Citrine One, Two, etc. (misko_2083)	0%	0	0%
Binary - Linux Lite Citrine 1, 10, 11, 100, etc. (misko_2083)	0%	0	0%
Colors - Linux Lite Citrine White (.2), Red (.4), Blue (.6), etc. (sysdrum)	43.75%	7	43.75%
Current Number Scheme - No Change (Linux Lite Citrine 3.x)	0%	0	0%
Total		16 vote(s)	100%

Beta Testers wanted for Lite Series Upgrade - Click here to register interest