Posts: 656
Threads: 106
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
What are the advantages of moving to 3.0 instead of just staying with 2.8? I think 2.8 will be supported until April 2019. :-\
Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Posts: 227
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
I think the better question is, "what is the DISadvantage of moving to 3.0?". I've got 2.8 on my desktop and 3.0 on my laptop. So far, I'm not seeing any huge differences but I'd still rather stay on top of the game.
Posts: 1,602
Threads: 86
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
Development for 2.8 has ceased, but you will continue to get security updates to your installed packages until April 2019. The advantage of moving to the next series is getting newer versions of packages, not just security updates. You'll also receive the newer functions and features (if any) of those updated packages. But it's perfectly fine to wait a while.
I have installed version 3.0 to a virtual machine using Virtualbox so that I can participate in supporting forum users, but I haven't installed it to my laptop or desktop yet. And I'm in no rush.
Want to thank me? Click my [Thank] link.
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
0
My .02
I installed BETA to a desktop along with 2.8 - I still run 2.8 for the majority...
On the Mini - I upgraded to a SSD and since it was a new HD I figured LL3.0 was the best route..
I have noticed a few minor things in the plus and minus columns, nothing as a just gotta have or a show stopper thou.
3.0 does seem to boot faster, it maybe that I've been using the mini more but I guess I could time it on the desktop..
For other benefits, see the 1st page of
https://mityer.khdlhfjijfrupr.tk/forums/relea...-released/
On the other side; having to set everything back up..
Apps, hardware/drivers, tweaks and modification to settings and apps; apps that have changed/updated that may not work as well as before (Conky is an example, not a LL issue) and XYZ to get back to an as it was before state..
Update if your ready to take on the task or as mentioned 2.8 is still supported 8)
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2016, 01:53 PM by
firenice03.)
Posts: 9,082
Threads: 573
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
15
The whole idea behind this project is to get Windows users to try a linux based operating system.
There's no pressure for existing linux users to install 3.0. Think of 3.0 as another version of Linux Lite for Windows folk to try.