Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2020
Reputation:
0
Well, I was going to install flatpak, but I really don't know if it creates a background service that will use more ram and cpu. Anyone know about it? Thanks!
Posts: 100
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation:
0
Aquasp, I was wondering about SNAPS, and APPIMAGES as well. Thanks in advance.
Posts: 100
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation:
0
Thanks for the benchmark page, aquasp...
Will digest this when I have time, but it seems that it answers my questions.
I wanted nothing to do with SNAPS, and messed up my install trying to remove anything snap-related
through Synaptic...and took out too much, losing my volume and who knows what else.
Result : I just reinstalled the complete 5.0.
Didn't take that long, but I learned a lesson I won't forget...don't take things out unless you are sure,
and even then, don't. LOL
Posts: 541
Threads: 20
Joined: May 2017
Reputation:
0
Some Ubuntu-based distros have refused to use snaps at all, for all kindsa reasons. But beginning in Ubuntu 20.04 snaps are the default rather than just an option as in Linux Lite.
Posts: 100
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation:
0
Yes, it seems Ubuntu is forcing the issue.
But maybe I am misreading this.
I'd rather appimages than snaps or flatpaks, anyway.
But I find I am definitely in the minority.
Posts: 9,087
Threads: 574
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
15
Our target audience would think a flatpak is a cardboard box that you build yourself. Snaps and Flatpaks don't belong in our OS. If linux folk want to add them later, go for it.