Posts: 101
Threads: 20
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
I just ran the commands on LL2
env X="() { :;} ; echo busted" /bin/sh -c "echo stuff"
env X="() { :;} ; echo busted" bash -c "echo stuff"
and the second command came back with "busted"
Meaning LL is vulnerable
I imagine the patch for this is reliant on Ubuntu developers?
I'm just this guy ... Y'know!?
Registered Linux User 533331
Posts: 857
Threads: 47
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
Since I was asked a few times, thought I pass it along.
The vulnerability test (in reply #3 by Valtam) is the same for both 32 and 64 bit version of Linux Lite.
Posts: 682
Threads: 98
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
0
Thanks for clarification and guidance. All OK here.
However
Are we vulnerable through our broadband routers?
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu 4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop 2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
(This post was last modified: 09-26-2014, 12:04 PM by
newtusmaximus.)
Posts: 9,087
Threads: 574
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
15
Done.
Sent from my mobile phone.