| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 7,984
» Latest member: EmmaAlva
» Forum threads: 9,472
» Forum posts: 62,475
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 1860 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 1855 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex
|
| Latest Threads |
Project Litening
Forum: Linux Lite Software Development
Last Post: valtam
04-06-2026, 05:35 AM
» Replies: 11
» Views: 904
|
Website forum links not w...
Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
Last Post: valtam
04-06-2026, 12:32 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 297
|
time synchronization
Forum: Other
Last Post: LL-user
04-03-2026, 03:13 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,533
|
Permissions on a secondar...
Forum: Other
Last Post: stevef
04-02-2026, 06:26 AM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 545
|
Some windows fail to rend...
Forum: Video Cards
Last Post: Crimson Plasma
03-31-2026, 04:19 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 332
|
Linux Lite 7.8 Final Rele...
Forum: Release Announcements
Last Post: Wirezfree
03-29-2026, 10:21 PM
» Replies: 16
» Views: 27,985
|
Accidentally Deleted fold...
Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
Last Post: trinidad
03-13-2026, 11:38 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 319
|
Linux lite 6.0 doesn't wo...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: Dottor Octopus
03-03-2026, 05:14 PM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 1,267
|
xfce-panel fuzzy clock
Forum: Installing Software
Last Post: valtam
02-28-2026, 02:38 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 318
|
Unable to Mount External ...
Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
Last Post: sqwuade
02-22-2026, 08:39 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 42,018
|
|
|
| join with cat |
|
Posted by: torolite35 - 04-02-2017, 12:55 PM - Forum: Other
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Good afternoon, I'm trying to join 3 .VOB files
From the terminal and something I'm not doing well because they do not join.
I'm putting cat * .VOB> file.vob but it does not work
Let's see if they know (sure if given that I always receive a satisfactory answer in this forum) I'm mistaken.
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
| Linux Lite mentioned at Techradar |
|
Posted by: JohnD - 04-02-2017, 12:45 AM - Forum: On Topic
- No Replies
|
 |
There is a short and very positive appraisal of Linux Lite at Techradar, it is mentioned as one of 10 in the article "10 of the best lightweight Linux distros".
Quote:[...] if you have a machine from the past 10 years with at least 1GB RAM inside you should find it a snappy, worthwhile option.
Try it on modern hardware and you'll be amazed at just how quick it runs. Given that it's just as happy running from USB media as it is installed on a hard drive – and, indeed, more than happy to run in a multi-boot configuration – it's a free burst of speed that's worth checking out.
After I've replaced a defect hd, I now have also installed Linux Lite. I've learned SuSE in 2000, 2001, but have not used it, because it won't accept a PC, which was accepted by Windows 95. In the last years I've passed a linux certificate from Webmasters Europe and tried or used for a longer time several distros: Debian, Linux Mint, LXLE, Parsix and other. Now I'm very happy with Linux Lite. It seems to be absolutely smooth and trouble-free. Cool stuff. 
Code: john@his-desktop ~> inxi -bz
System: Host: his-desktop Kernel: 4.4.0-71-generic x86_64 (64 bit) Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: Ubuntu 16.04 xenial
Machine: Mobo: ASRock model: N68-S Bios: American Megatrends v: P1.60 date: 09/21/2009
CPU: Dual core AMD Athlon II X2 240 (-MCP-) speed/max: 2100/2800 MHz
Graphics: Card: NVIDIA C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a]
Display Server: X.Org 1.18.4 drivers: nvidia (unloaded: fbdev,vesa,nouveau)
Resolution: [email protected]
GLX Renderer: GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a/integrated/SSE2 GLX Version: 2.1.2 NVIDIA 304.135
Network: Card: NVIDIA MCP61 Ethernet driver: forcedeth
Drives: HDD Total Size: 1000.2GB (33.4% used)
Info: Processes: 189 Uptime: 1 day Memory: 1524.8/1747.7MB Client: Shell (fish) inxi: 2.2.35
|
|
|
| Installer crash, but installation completed |
|
Posted by: bonnevie - 04-02-2017, 12:29 AM - Forum: On Topic
- No Replies
|
 |
This forum is packed with useful tech resources when it comes to solving a problem. Here's how my new 3.4 installation went today.
Installer was crashing everytime just before the end of the process, so I started poking around the LL forum. And thanks to an old Coastie post, I read that sometime LL ends up being installed anyway even after a crash message. So I tried installing LL3.0 alongside LL2.8 on my 10-year old Compaq Notebook.
To be sure, the installer crashed but I also noticed that the partitioning was completed. I couldn't check my Grub menu since I don't see it when I boot up. But again, thanks to a 2015 post here, I found out how to get back the Grub screen. And there it was! LL 3.0 installed properly. A bit of a rocky road, but the results make me very happy! The last step, updating from 3.0 to 3.4 barely took 36 minutes and 522MB :-D
|
|
|
| Newbie |
|
Posted by: galaxydude333 - 04-01-2017, 08:32 PM - Forum: Introductions
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Just getting into programming and Linux. Any help or pointers books whatever would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
| Booting up really slowly please help |
|
Posted by: galaxydude333 - 04-01-2017, 08:19 PM - Forum: Other
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I am just getting into programming and linux. I really like the OS but I am having like 3 min boot up times. Anyone that can help it would be greatly appreciated.
curtis@Vaio:~$ systemd-analyze blame
10.134s NetworkManager-wait-online.service
751ms lvm2-monitor.service
695ms dev-sda1.device
451ms nmbd.service
404ms samba-ad-dc.service
369ms ModemManager.service
328ms NetworkManager.service
314ms gpu-manager.service
308ms apparmor.service
306ms accounts-daemon.service
277ms grub-common.service
246ms lm-sensors.service
246ms ufw.service
231ms thermald.service
228ms smbd.service
224ms systemd-logind.service
207ms lightdm.service
175ms virtualbox-guest-utils.service
174ms irqbalance.service
157ms networking.service
146ms upower.service
140ms console-kit-log-system-start.service
132ms alsa-restore.service
lines 1-23...skipping...
10.134s NetworkManager-wait-online.service
751ms lvm2-monitor.service
695ms dev-sda1.device
451ms nmbd.service
404ms samba-ad-dc.service
369ms ModemManager.service
328ms NetworkManager.service
314ms gpu-manager.service
308ms apparmor.service
306ms accounts-daemon.service
277ms grub-common.service
246ms lm-sensors.service
246ms ufw.service
231ms thermald.service
228ms smbd.service
224ms systemd-logind.service
207ms lightdm.service
175ms virtualbox-guest-utils.service
174ms irqbalance.service
157ms networking.service
146ms upower.service
140ms console-kit-log-system-start.service
132ms alsa-restore.service
129ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
127ms keyboard-setup.service
126ms ubiquity.service
122ms rsyslog.service
115ms systemd-user-sessions.service
|
|
|
| Skip upgrade |
|
Posted by: Manuk - 04-01-2017, 01:19 PM - Forum: On Topic
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I am using Linux Lite 3.2 right now. If I decide not to upgrade to 3.4 will I be able to upgrade from 3.2 to 3.6
thanks
|
|
|
| zRAM not Swaping |
|
Posted by: revox - 04-01-2017, 04:26 AM - Forum: Other
- Replies (3)
|
 |
I installed zRAM through Synaptic Package Manager.
When I do a .......
[sub]cat /proc/swaps[/sub]
I get ..........
[sub]Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/sda5 partition 3981308 0 -1
/dev/zram0 partition 752016 0 5
/dev/zram1 partition 752016 0 5
[/sub]
Looks like the Swap is not used...
I did this after install.....
[sub]gksudo leafpad /etc/sysctl.conf[/sub]
AND added this .......
[sub]# Decrease swap usage to a more reasonable level
vm.swappiness=50[/sub]
Any Help Appreciated.
|
|
|
| Can't distinguish a Beta install from a Final |
|
Posted by: jcoles - 04-01-2017, 03:28 AM - Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (6)
|
 |
It's good to see the release of Linux Lite 3.4 Final.
I've been using a 3.4 Beta installation and have kept it updated. But I assume that I must do a full install of the Final because the release notes say "There is no upgrade path to or from Beta releases."
I have just noticed, though, that there's no indication in the installed OS that it is a Beta rather than a Final. Even the System Information app shows "Linux Lite 3.4" instead of "Linux Lite 3.4 Beta". If I didn't know that I installed the OS before the Final ISO release, there's no way I could tell. Presumably, if I forgot to install 3.4 Final, I would later find myself unable to upgrade to v3.6 using Lite Upgrade. There should be a clear and obvious way to tell the difference between Beta and Final. Either that, or allow the Beta to be upgraded to Final.
|
|
|
|